Psychometric Analysis of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Author:

Miley Emilie N.12ORCID,Casanova Madeline P.34ORCID,Pickering Michael A.5,Cheatham Scott W.5,Larkins Lindsay W.5ORCID,Cady Adam C.6ORCID,Baker Russell T.34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sports Sciences and Medicine, Department of Health, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA

2. Tallahassee Orthopedic Clinic, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA

3. WWAMI Medical Education Program, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA

4. Idaho Office of Underserved and Rural Medical Research, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA

5. Department of Movement Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA

6. Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, Los Angeles, CA 91367, USA

Abstract

Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (HOOS) was developed as a region- and disease-specific outcome to assess hip disability. Despite the use of the HOOS in clinical practice and research, psychometric analyses of the scale in a large dataset of patients have not been performed. As such, the purposes of this study were to assess the structural validity of the HOOS in patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty. Data were obtained from the Surgical Outcome System (SOS) global registry. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the scale structure of the 40-item HOOS and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a parsimonious scale structure. The parsimonious model identified was subjected to multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing and LGC modeling. The original five-factor, 40-item HOOS did not meet recommended model fit indices values (CFI = 0.822, TLI = 0.809, IFI = 0.822, RMSEA = 0.085). Alternate model generation identified an alternative model (i.e., HOOS-9). Sound model fit was identified for the HOOS-9 (CFI = 0.974, TLI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.046). Invariance testing criteria were also met between groups (i.e., age and sex) and across time. Lastly, a nonlinear growth trajectory was identified in responses pertaining to hip disability. The original scale structure of the 40-item HOOS was not supported. The HOOS-9 met contemporary model fit recommendations, along with multi-group and longitudinal invariance testing. Our findings support the preliminary use of the HOOS-9 to assess hip function and disability in research and clinical practice.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference48 articles.

1. Nilsdotter, A.K., Lohmander, L.S., Klässbo, M., and Roos, E.M. (2003). Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—Validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 4.

2. Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee;Bellamy;J. Rheumatol.,1988

3. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—DEVelopment of a self-administered outcome measure;Roos;J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.,1998

4. (2021, July 25). A User’s Guide to: Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Available online: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Hip_Disability_and_Osteoarthritis_Outcome_Score.

5. (2021, July 25). Measure Methodology, Available online: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/Measure-Methodology.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3