Geographic and Specialty-Specific Disparities in Physicians’ Legal Compliance: A National-Scale Assessment of Romanian Medical Practice

Author:

Nanu Codrut Andrei1ORCID,Plaiasu Maria Cristina2ORCID,Edu Antoine3

Affiliation:

1. Department No. 14 of Orthopedics, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, 020021 Bucharest, Romania

2. Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 2 Petru Rares St, 200349 Craiova, Romania

3. Department No. 14 of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu Street, 020021 Bucharest, Romania

Abstract

Background: Physicians must respect their patients’ rights to informed consent, privacy, access to medical records, non-discrimination, treatment by a qualified doctor, and a second medical opinion. Compliance with patients’ rights is mandatory, and legal breaches are considered medical malpractice under Romanian law. This is the first study to assess physicians’ practices nationally and create a geographical map of legal compliance. Results: We examined survey responses of 2978 physicians, including 1587 general practitioners and 1391 attending physicians from high-risk specialties. According to the findings, 46.67% of physicians’ practices adhered to the law. Physicians’ practices were homogenous across the country’s regions. General practitioners were significantly more legally compliant than attending physicians were. Additionally, 94.02% of the physicians acknowledged malpractice anxiety, whereas only 17.67% had been accused of malpractice. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the need for further research and to voice issues about Romanian physicians’ low level of legal compliance. This study provides a starting point for future studies to evaluate the benefits of interventional strategies in this field. Healthcare facilities should provide physicians with easily available resources when they are unsure about their legal obligations, and establish an observer organization that can detect unlawful conduct. Interventions should concentrate on education programs and expert guidance.

Funder

European Social Fund

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference36 articles.

1. The Role of Law in Medical Progress;Stason;Law Contemp. Probl.,1967

2. Sanatatii, M. (2023, January 23). Acte Normative Aprobate. Available online: https://www.ms.ro/acte-normative-aprobate/.

3. (2023, January 23). Physicians Trco. The Code of Medical Deontology. Available online: https://www.ceom-ecmo.eu/sites/default/files/documents/romanian_code_of_medical_deontologypdf.pdf.

4. Shared decision-making (SDM) in dentistry: A concise narrative review;J. Eval. Clin. Pract.,2019

5. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango);Charles;Soc. Sci. Med.,1997

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3