Abstract
(1) Background: One of the main cardinal signs of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is rigidity, whose assessment is important for monitoring the patient’s recovery. The wrist is one of the joints most affected by this symptom, which has a great impact on activities of daily living and consequently on quality of life. The assessment of rigidity is traditionally made by clinical scales, which have limitations due to their subjectivity and low intra- and inter-examiner reliability. (2) Objectives: To compile the main methods used to assess wrist rigidity in PD and to study their validity and reliability, a scope review was conducted. (3) Methods: PubMed, IEEE/IET Electronic Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Bireme, Google Scholar and Science Direct databases were used. (4) Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. The studies presented several methods for quantitative assessment of rigidity using instruments such as force and inertial sensors. (5) Conclusions: Such methods present good correlation with clinical scales and are useful for detecting and monitoring rigidity. However, the development of a standard quantitative method for assessing rigidity in clinical practice remains a challenge.
Funder
National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel
Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais
CNPq, Brazi
Program CAPES/COFECUB
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference61 articles.
1. Parkinson Disease;Poewe;Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim.,2017
2. Pathoanatomy of Parkinson’s Disease;Braak;Proceedings of the Journal of Neurology, Supplement,2000
3. Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms and Models;Dauer;Neuron,2003
4. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s Disease;Tysnes;J. Neural Transm.,2017
5. The Clinical Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease;Sveinbjornsdottir;J. Neurochem.,2016
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献