No-Restraint Committed General Hospital Psychiatric Units (SPDCs) in Italy—A Descriptive Organizational Study

Author:

Pocobello Raffaella1ORCID,Camilli Francesca1,Rossi Giovanni2,Davì Maurizio3,Corbascio Caterina2,Tancredi Domenico2,Oretti Alessandra4,Bonavigo Tommaso4,Galeazzi Gian Maria56ORCID,Wegenberger Oliver7,el Sehity Tarek17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 00196 Rome, Italy

2. Club SPDC—No Restraint, 34143 Trieste, Italy

3. Dipartimento Transmurale Salute Mentale, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari—APSS, 38100 Trento, Italy

4. Dipartimento Dipendenze e Salute Mentale, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, 34128 Trieste, Italy

5. Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy

6. Department of Mental Health and Drug Abuse, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy

7. Faculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud Private University, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

This study describes and explores the application of no-restraint policies in General Hospital Psychiatric Units (GHPUs) in Italy, a country pioneering in deinstitutionalization and psychiatric reform. The research aims to assess the organizational characteristics and effectiveness of no-restraint practices, contributing to the global discourse on humane psychiatric care. Following a purposive sampling approach, a nationwide descriptive study was conducted involving a detailed online survey distributed to 24 GHPUs actively engaged in or aspiring toward no-restraint practices. The survey, comprising 60 items across seven sections, gathered comprehensive data on the structural, organizational, and operational dimensions of the units, along with the prevalence and management of restraint episodes. Results reveal a significant commitment to no-restraint policies, with 14 GHPUs reporting zero restraint incidents in 2022. Despite variations in infrastructure and staffing, a common thread was the implementation of systematic procedures and risk management training aimed at reducing coercive practices. The study identified a correlation between the use of exclusive garden spaces and an increased incidence of restraints, suggesting nuanced factors influencing restraint practices. The findings underscore the viability and ethical alignment of no-restraint practices within psychiatric care, highlighting the crucial role of organizational protocols and training. This research adds empirical weight to the advocacy for restraint-free environments in mental health settings, signaling a paradigm shift toward more humane and rights-respecting psychiatric care.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference33 articles.

1. United Nations (2024, April 09). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.

2. (2024, April 09). Ending Coercion in Mental Health: The Need for a Human Rights-Based Approach: Hearing on Resolution 2291 (2019) before the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development, Parliamentary Assembly 2019-Third Part-Session. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/parliamentary-assembly-of-the-council-of-europe-debate-on-ending-coerc/168095114a.

3. (2024, April 09). WHO TEAM—Mental Health and Substance Use. Guidance on Community Mental Health Services: Promoting Person-Centred and Rights-Based Approaches. World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240025707.

4. Preventing and reducing “coercion” in mental health services: An international scoping review of English-language studies;Gooding;Acta Psychiatr. Scand.,2020

5. Whittington, R., Aluh, D.O., and Caldas-de-Almeida, J.-M. (2023). Zero Tolerance for Coercion? Historical, Cultural and Organisational Contexts for Effective Implementation of Coercion-Free Mental Health Services around the World. Healthcare, 11.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3