Croatian Translation and Validation of the Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care Quality Questionnaire (PSNCQQ)

Author:

Mamić Marin123,Vidić Hrvoje12ORCID,Jovanović Tihomir234,Galić Slavka5,Jelinčić Ivana236,Mikšić Štefica3ORCID,Lovrić Božica13,Zirdum Ivanka1,Matković Kristijan1,Zukanović Goran127,Radmilović Goranka1,Puharić Zrinka38ORCID,Frančina Mirela1,Lovrić Robert3ORCID,Vukoja Ivan127

Affiliation:

1. General County Hospital Požega, Osječka 107, 34 000 Požega, Croatia

2. Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, J. Huttlera 4, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia

3. Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia

4. General Hospital Pakrac and Hospital of Croatian Veterans, Bolnička 74, 34 550 Pakrac, Croatia

5. The Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Slavonski Brod, 35000 Slavonski Brod, Croatia

6. Department of Integrative Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre Osijek, J. Huttlera 4, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia

7. Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Ul. Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia

8. Department of Nursing, University of Applied Sciences Bjelovar, 43 000 Bjelovar, Croatia

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is a crucial measure of the quality of healthcare, especially with regard to nursing services in hospital settings. Understanding and increasing patient satisfaction with nursing care is critical to improving overall healthcare and ensuring positive patient experiences during their hospital stay. The aim of this research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Satisfaction with Nursing Care Quality Questionnaire (PSNCQQ), test the reliability and validity of the tool after translation, and investigate differences in patient satisfaction based on demographic variables, as well as their contribution to satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. After translation and adaptation, the Croatian version of the PSNCQQ was applied to 350 hospitalized patients (average age 51.19 years (range: 18–87)), of whom 194 (55.4%) were men and 156 (44.6%) were women. The results showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.977) and confirmed the one-factor structure of the questionnaire, explaining 70.64% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional model, showing strong fit indices (χ2 = 583.047, df = 149, p < 0.001, GFI = 0.861, AGFI = 0.818, NFI = 0.936, TLI = 0.946, CFI = 0.955, RMSEA = 0.080, PCLOSE < 0.001). In conclusion, the validation of the PSNCQQ in the Croatian language increases resources for evaluating and improving the quality of nursing care. This research lays the foundation for future studies and practical applications aimed at improving patient satisfaction and nursing care outcomes in Croatia, but there are also limitations to this study, including its one-institution scope, the possible influence of factors outside the current treatment on satisfaction, and the lack of comparison with objective clinical indicators.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference50 articles.

1. Donabedian, A. (1980). The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, Health Administration Press.

2. Svirydzenka, N., Ronzoni, P., and Dogra, N. (2017). Meaning and barriers to quality care service provision in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. BMC Health Serv. Res., 17.

3. Evaluating the quality of medical care;Donabedian;Milbank Q.,2005

4. What Quality of Care Means? Exploring Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions on the Concept of Quality Care: A Qualitative Study;Stavropoulou;Clin. Pract.,2022

5. (2024, January 17). Handbook for National Quality Policy and Strategy—A Practical Approach for Developing Policy and Strategy to Improve Quality of Care, Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565561.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3