Examination of the Public’s Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans

Author:

Mane Heran,Yue Xiaohe,Yu WeijunORCID,Doig Amara ChannellORCID,Wei HanxueORCID,Delcid Nataly,Harris Afia-Grace,Nguyen Thu T.,Nguyen Quynh C.ORCID

Abstract

The overturning of Roe v Wade reinvigorated the national debate on abortion. We used Twitter data to examine temporal, geographical and sentiment patterns in the public’s reaction. Using the Twitter API for Academic Research, a random sample of publicly available tweets was collected from 1 May–15 July in 2021 and 2022. Tweets were filtered based on keywords relating to Roe v Wade and abortion (227,161 tweets in 2021 and 504,803 tweets in 2022). These tweets were tagged for sentiment, tracked by state, and indexed over time. Time plots reveal low levels of conversations on these topics until the leaked Supreme Court opinion in early May 2022. Unlike pro-choice tweets which declined, pro-life conversations continued with renewed interest throughout May and increased again following the official overturning of Roe v Wade. Conversations were less prevalent in some these states had abortion trigger laws (Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi). Collapsing across topic categories, 2022 tweets were more negative and less neutral and positive compared to 2021 tweets. In network analysis, tweets mentioning woman/women, supreme court, and abortion spread faster and reached to more Twitter users than those mentioning Roe Wade and Scotus. Twitter data can provide real-time insights into the experiences and perceptions of people across the United States, which can be used to inform healthcare policies and decision-making.

Funder

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

National Library of Medicine

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference58 articles.

1. Mohr, J.C. (1979). Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, Oxford University Press.

2. Lessons from before Roe: Will past be prologue?;Gold;Guttmacher Rep. Public Policy,2003

3. Brice, M., and Cooney, P. (2022). Reuters, Available online: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/supreme-courts-roe-v-wade-decision-hinged-womens-right-privacy-2022-05-03/.

4. Munson, Z. (2018). Abortion Politics, John Wiley & Sons.

5. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2019;Kortsmit;MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. Surveill. Summ.,2020

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3