Barriers and Facilitators to the Learning and Acquisition of Research Competencies among Nursing Students through Active Methodologies: A Qualitative Study Using Reflective Writing

Author:

Velarde-García Juan Francisco123ORCID,Álvarez-Embarba Beatriz1ORCID,Moro-Tejedor María Nieves12ORCID,Rodríguez-Leal Leyre1,Arrogante Oscar24ORCID,Alvarado-Zambrano María Gema5,Pérez-Corrales Jorge36ORCID,Palacios-Ceña Domingo36ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing, Red Cross College of Nursing, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Avenida Reina Victoria 28, 28003 Madrid, Spain

2. Research Nursing Group of Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Calle del Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain

3. Research Group of Humanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science (Hum & QRinHS), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain

4. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podology, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal, 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain

5. Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain

6. Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain

Abstract

Background: The development of educational research, critical thinking skills, and evidence-based practice requires proposals for educational innovation. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of undergraduate nursing students on the barriers and facilitators after the implementation of a novel activity within the course of research methodology, composed of three active learning strategies: (a) project-based learning; (b) small-group learning; and (c) self-directed learning. Methods: A qualitative exploratory study using reflective writing was conducted at the Nursing Department of the Red Cross School (Spain). Seventy-four nursing students participated in the study, enrolled in the research methodology course. Purposive sampling was used. Online reflective notes were collected from a script of open-ended questions. An inductive thematic analysis was performed. Results: The new proposals facilitated learning of the subject matter and its contents. They were useful and enabled the students to put the contents into practice. In addition, they improved the students’ organization, planning, and involvement. The barriers identified were a lack of time, ambiguity, inadequate tutoring or novelty of the work, and inequity in the distribution of tasks and workloads. Conclusions: Our findings shed light on the barriers and facilitators identified by nursing students when implementing an educational innovation proposal, using three active learning methodologies as learning tools for the subject of nursing research.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference67 articles.

1. Healey, M., and Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry, Higher Education Academy.

2. High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter;Kuh;Peer Rev.,2012

3. Healey, M. (2005). Reshaping the University: New Relationships between Research, Scholarship and Teaching, McGraw-Hill.

4. Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences of conducting clinical research projects in their bachelor theses—A Qualitative Study;Karlsholm;SAGE Open Nurs.,2022

5. Competencies are all the rage in education;J. Cancer Educ.,2004

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3