Does Sex Matter to the Biomedical Approach in Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)?: A Systematic Review of Methodology Documents Used in the Spanish National Health System

Author:

González Ramos Ana M.1ORCID,Serrano-Gemes Gema2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Advanced Social Studies (IESA), The Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain

2. Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Ponferrada University Campus, University of León, 24401 Ponferrada, Spain

Abstract

Sex and gender are important variables in health, although their incorporation in medicine has been very slow. If research is sensitive and yields fruitful sex and gender evidence, these results should be included in the guidelines for clinical practices. However, literature claims that clinical practice guidelines devote very little space to these categories. The present systematic review addresses the relevance of sex and gender dimensions through methodology documents for the development of clinical practice guidelines based on three sources: the AGREE Reporting Checklist, the GRADE Handbook, and the Spanish GuíaSalud NHS Clinical Guideline Program. Findings suggest that neglecting sex and gender issues in the biomedical approach may lead to continuing to ignore relevant evidence on biological and social dimensions that do indeed influence people’s health and diseases.

Funder

Spanish National Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference36 articles.

1. Lanzenberger, R., Kranz, G.S., and Savic, I. (2020). Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Elsevier. 175 (3rd series) Sex Differences in Neurology and Psychiatry.

2. Gender medicine: Lessons from COVID-19 and other medical conditions for designing health policy;Machluf;World J. Clin. Cases,2020

3. Jenkins, M.R., and Newman, C.B. (2021). How Sex and Gender Impact Clinical Practice. An Evidence-Based Guide to Patient Care, Academic Press.

4. Bird, C.E., Convad, P., and Timmermans, S. (2010). Handbook of Medical Sociology, Vanderbitt Press.

5. A systematic approach for uptake of evidence on sex-specific issues in guidelines—A pilot study;Keuken;J. Eval. Clin. Pr.,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3