Reconstructive Surgery of Pressure Injuries in Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Patients: Retrospective Observational Study and Proposal of an Algorithm for the Flap Choice

Author:

Sgarzani Rossella1,Rucci Paola2,Landi Siriana3,Battilana Micaela3,Capirossi Rita3,Aramini Beatrice1ORCID,Negosanti Luca3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC Dpt.), Bologna University, Via G. Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, BO, Italy

2. Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie (DIBINEM Dpt.), Bologna University, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40126 Bologna, BO, Italy

3. Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute, Via Montecatone 37, 40026 Imola, BO, Italy

Abstract

Pressure injuries (PIs) are a common complication in patients with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D), and deep PIs require surgical treatment consisting of wide debridement and adequate reconstruction. We conducted a retrospective observational study at a tertiary rehabilitation hospital for SCI/D in Italy with the aim of describing the incidence and associated risk factors of postoperative complications in individuals with SCI/D presenting with chronic deep PIs, treated with a specific flap selection algorithm based on the site of the defect, the presence of scars from previous surgeries, and the need to spare reconstructive options for possible future recurrences. Medical records of surgical procedures performed on SCI/D patients with fourth-degree PIs, according to NPUAP classification (National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel), between July 2011 and January 2018 were reviewed. A total of 434 surgical procedures for fourth-degree PIs in 375 SCI/D patients were analyzed. After a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 12–36), 59 PIs (13.6%) had minor complications, and 17 (3.9%) had major complications requiring reoperation. The sacral site and muscular and musculocutaneous flaps were significant risk factors for postoperative complications. Six patients (1.4%) had a recurrence. The choice of flap correlates with the outcome of decubitus reconstruction. Therefore, reconstructive planning should be based on established principles.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3