Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review

Author:

Rodríguez-Suárez Claudio-Alberto12ORCID,González-de la Torre Héctor12ORCID,Hernández-De Luis María-Naira3ORCID,Fernández-Gutiérrez Domingo-Ángel45ORCID,Martínez-Alberto Carlos-Enrique6ORCID,Brito-Brito Pedro-Ruymán45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Support Unit, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex, Canary Health Service, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

2. Nursing Department, Faculty of Healthcare Science, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

3. El Doctoral Primary Health Care Centre, Canary Health Service, 35110 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

4. Primary Care Management of Tenerife, Canary Health Service, 38004 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

5. Faculty of Healthcare Science, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), 38200 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

6. Nuestra Señora de Candelaria School of Nursing, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

Abstract

The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals’ health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses’ interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.

Funder

Spanish Center For Evidence-Based Care: A Center of Excellence of the Joanna Briggs Institute

Official College of Nurses of Santa Cruz de Tenerife

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference32 articles.

1. Impact of nursing diagnoses on patient and organisational outcomes: A systematic literature review;Sanson;J. Clin. Nurs.,2017

2. Proceso de enfermería; lo que sí es y lo que no es;Enfermería Univ.,2016

3. Nursing Diagnoses Determined by First Year Students: A Vignette Study;Korhan;Int. J. Nurs. Knowl.,2014

4. Cross-Mapping of Nursing Care Terms Recorded in Italian Hospitals into the Standardized NNN Terminology;Zeffiro;Int. J. Nurs. Knowl.,2020

5. Herdman, T., Kamitsuru, S., and Takáo Lopes, C. (2021). NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses. Definitions and Classification, 2021–2023, Thieme. [12th ed.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3