Affiliation:
1. Institute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana—College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
2. Department of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology—Tyrol, 6060 Hall, Austria
Abstract
Homogeneous waiting group (HWG) criteria are central to the patient referral process, guiding primary care physicians and hospitalists in directing patient care to specialists. This cross-sectional observational study, conducted in South Tyrol, Italy, in 2023, aimed to assess the implementation and impact of HWG criteria on healthcare from the perspective of general practitioners and hospital physicians. A questionnaire was developed to gain knowledge about referral practices as perceived by general practitioners and specialists. The survey included 313 participants (82 general practitioners and 231 hospital physicians) and was designed to capture a range of factors influencing the application of HWG criteria, including communication and collaboration practices. The results showed moderate levels of familiarity with HWG criteria and opinions about the need for criteria refinement among hospitalists, indicating that further education and refinement of these criteria are warranted. Both general practitioners and hospital physicians expressed dissatisfaction with the current specialist referral system, highlighting the significant gaps in effective communication and collaboration. The survey also demonstrated the influence of patient demands and waiting times on referral practices, and the need for streamlined and accessible specialist care. This study highlights the need for improvement and adaptation of HWG criteria to better meet the needs of healthcare providers and patients in South Tyrol. By addressing the identified gaps in communication, collaboration, and education related to the HWG system, the efficiency, effectiveness, and patient-centeredness of the referral process can be improved, ultimately leading to better health outcomes.
Reference31 articles.
1. Tanner, M. (2008). The Grass Is Not Always Greener: A Look at National Health Care Systems around the World. Cato Policy Anal. Pap., 613.
2. Ministero della Salute (2024, January 14). RAO—Procedura per l’applicazione Gestionale, Available online: https://www.salute.gov.it/portale/listeAttesa/dettaglioContenutiListeAttesa.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=5138&area=listeAttesa&menu=vuoto.
3. (2024, January 14). Manuale RAO per l’accesso Alle Prestazioni Specialistiche Ambulatoriali—AGENAS, Available online: https://www.agenas.gov.it/comunicazione/primo-piano/1798-manuale-rao-per-l%E2%80%99accesso-alle-prestazioni-specialistiche-ambulatoriali.
4. OECD (2022). Health at a Glance: Europe 2022: State of Health in the EU Cycle, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
5. Waiting Time Prioritisation for Specialist Services in Italy: The Homogeneous Waiting Time Groups Approach;Mariotti;Health Policy,2014