Effectiveness of Online Programmes for Family Carers of People with Intellectual Disabilities: Systematic Review of the International Evidence Base

Author:

Leonard Rachel1ORCID,Hughes Nathan2,Forbes Trisha1,Brown Michael1ORCID,Marsh Lynne1ORCID,Truesdale Maria3,Todd Stuart4ORCID,Linden Mark1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK

2. Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

3. College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK

4. School of Care Sciences, University of South Wales, Usk Way, Newport NP20 2BP, UK

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the evidence base on the effectiveness of online programmes on the mental health and well-being of family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. Databases (ERIC, Medline, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched for intervention studies that considered online interventions for family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. Data were extracted using standardised data extraction tools. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). Screening, extraction and assessment of bias were completed independently by two members of the research team. Given the low number of included studies and different outcomes assessed within them, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis; therefore, data are presented narratively. Two studies met the criteria to be included in the review. Both studies utilised a feasibility randomised controlled trial methodology. One study found a significant decrease in parental stress, while the other found a significant increase in psychological well-being. Caution must be taken in drawing firm conclusions, given the small sample sizes and low retention rates in both studies. Online programmes seem to offer potential benefits to family carers of people with intellectual disabilities. However, further investigation is needed to examine these programmes, adopting a collaborative approach with family carers.

Funder

UKRI Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference55 articles.

1. Family carers of people with learning disabilities: Common themes across caring;Yannamani;Psychiatry,2009

2. Nuffield Trust (2022, February 23). Adults with Learning Disabilities Who Live in Their Own Home or with Their Family. Available online: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/adults-with-learning-disabilities-who-live-in-their-own-home-or-with-their-family.

3. Morris, K., Hughes, N., Clarke, H., Tew, J., Mason, P., Galvani, S., Lewis, A., and Loveless, L. (2024, February 12). Think Family: A Literature Review of Whole Family Approaches. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4156933.pdf.

4. Social Exclusion Task Force (2022, March 21). Think Family: Improving the Life Chances of Families at Risk. Available online: https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/17766/.

5. Models and Approaches in Family-Focused Policy and Practice;Hughes;Soc. Policy Soc.,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3