Brain Analysis with a Complex Network Approach in Stroke Patients Based on Electroencephalography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Asadi Borhan1ORCID,Cuenca-Zaldivar Juan Nicolás234,Nakhostin Ansari Noureddin56,Ibáñez Jaime78ORCID,Herrero Pablo1ORCID,Calvo Sandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, IIS Aragon, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain

2. Grupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain

3. Physical Therapy Unit, Primary Health Care Center “El Abajón”, 28231 Las Rozas de Madrid, Spain

4. Research Group in Nursing and Health Care, Puerta de Hierro Health Research Institute—Segovia de Arana (IDIPHISA), 28222 Majadahonda, Spain

5. Research Center for War-Affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 14155-6559, Iran

6. Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 14155-6559, Iran

7. BSICoS Group, IIS Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain

8. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Abstract

Background and purpose: Brain function can be networked, and these networks typically present drastic changes after having suffered a stroke. The objective of this systematic review was to compare EEG-related outcomes in adults with stroke and healthy individuals with a complex network approach. Methods: The literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane and ScienceDirect from their inception until October 2021. Results: Ten studies were selected, nine of which were cohort studies. Five of them were of good quality, whereas four were of fair quality. Six studies showed a low risk of bias, whereas the other three studies presented a moderate risk of bias. In the network analysis, different parameters such as the path length, cluster coefficient, small-world index, cohesion and functional connection were used. The effect size was small and not significant in favor of the group of healthy subjects (Hedges’g = 0.189 [−0.714, 1.093], Z = 0.582, p = 0.592). Conclusions: The systematic review found that there are structural differences between the brain network of post-stroke patients and healthy individuals as well as similarities. However, there was no specific distribution network to allows us to differentiate them and, therefore, more specialized and integrated studies are needed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3