Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Care in OECD Countries: Focusing on Long-Term Care Financing Type

Author:

Lee Seok-HwanORCID,Chon Yongho,Kim Yun-YoungORCID

Abstract

This study aims to examine the characteristics of long-term care (LTC) financing in Organization for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD) countries. To this end, the 26 OECD countries that have introduced LTC systems were classified into three types of models: tax-based, health insurance, and LTC insurance (LTCI) systems. Thereafter, these systems were analyzed using Gilbert and Terrell’s policy analysis framework. The results indicated differences in the characteristics of each type of financing in terms of allocation, benefit provision, service delivery, and finance. It is likely that while the LTC insurance model was mainly based on universalism and showed the highest level of coverage, the tax-based and health insurance models adopted selectivism with lower level of benefits per capita. In terms of service delivery, local authorities tended to have the responsibility to decide LTC service users and provide services in many countries, regardless of the type of model. In terms of finance, LTC insurance-based countries had the highest LTC expenditure as a percentage of GDP, followed by countries with tax-based and health insurance systems.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference26 articles.

1. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundation of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford University Press.

2. OECD (2020). Assessing the Comparability of Long-Term Care Spending Estimates under the Joint Health Accounts Questionnaire, OECD.

3. Restructuring the welfare state: Reforms in long-term care in Western European countries;Pavolini;J. Eur. Soc. Policy,2008

4. Xia, L., Chai, L., Zhang, H., and Sun, Z. (2022). Mapping the global landscape of long-term care insurance research: A scientometric analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.

5. Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare State in Transition, Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3