Affiliation:
1. Center for Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2. Department for Clinical Neurosciences and Preventive Medicine, University for Continuing Education Krems, Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria
3. Neurological Rehabilitation Center Rosenhügel, Rosenhügelstraße 192a, 1130 Vienna, Austria
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic climbing (TC) has emerged as a prospective rehabilitation approach for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). The existing literature primarily focuses on the physical and psychological benefits of TC across diverse populations but is limited concerning its application and efficacy for patients with MS. Objectives: This study aimed to delineate the experiences, subjective effects, and perceptions of both individuals with MS and therapists regarding TC, highlighting the potential benefits and challenges of this therapeutic approach. Methods: Using a qualitative design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients living with MS (N = 5) and therapists (N = 7) involved in TC sessions at a rehabilitation facility. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to thematic qualitative text analysis. Results: Our analysis resulted in the identification of five main categories: (1) motivational factors, (2) training conditions, (3) training content, (4) observed effects, and (5) safety protocol. Our findings primarily centred around the motivational aspects of TC. Participants consistently reported experiencing feelings of accomplishment, success, enjoyment, and increased self-confidence. Furthermore, TC was often perceived as a comprehensive intervention, addressing endurance, strength, flexibility, neuromotor functions, cognition, and mental health while having a low-risk profile. However, due to the demanding nature of TC, careful fatigue management is crucial. This entails personalised intensity adjustments during sessions and coordinating TC with other physically demanding therapies when implementing TC within a rehabilitation environment. Conclusions: TC shows promise within MS rehabilitation and can be considered safe under certain framework conditions. This research sheds light on its potential benefits, facilitators, and barriers and provides insights for practical integration into rehabilitation programs.
Reference40 articles.
1. WHO (2019). ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, WHO.
2. Tafti, D., Ehsan, M., and Xixis, K.L. (2022). Multiple Sclerosis, StatPearls Publishing LLC.
3. Symptomatic therapy and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis;Kesselring;Lancet Neurol.,2005
4. Kwiatkowski, A., Marissal, J.P., Pouyfaucon, M., Vermersch, P., Hautecoeur, P., and Dervaux, B. (2014). Social participation in patients with multiple sclerosis: Correlations between disability and economic burden. BMC Neurol., 14.
5. The association of fatigue and social participation in multiple sclerosis as assessed using two different instruments;Salter;Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord.,2019