Understanding the Impact of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain on Daily Life from a Gender Perspective Using the PAIN_Integral Scale©
-
Published:2024-03-20
Issue:6
Volume:12
Page:695
-
ISSN:2227-9032
-
Container-title:Healthcare
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Healthcare
Author:
Cáceres-Matos Rocío1ORCID, Vázquez-Santiago Soledad1, Pabón-Carrasco Manuel1ORCID, Cabrera-León Andrés23ORCID, Gil-García Eugenia1
Affiliation:
1. Research Group CTS-1050: “Complex Care, Chronicity and Health Outcomes”, Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain 2. Department of Public Health, Andalusian School of Public Health, 18011 Granada, Spain 3. Biomedical Research Consortium in Epidemiology and Public Health Network (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
Abstract
The experience of chronic non-cancer pain differs between women and men due to gender-related factors. This study (1) assessed the difference in responses to the impact of chronic non-cancer pain on daily life in women and men using the PAIN_Integral Scale© and (2) evaluated its invariance through multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. This was conducted by means of an analysis of invariance through a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. A cross-sectional sample of 400 participants over 18 years of age with Chronic Non-Oncological Pain in Pain Units and Primary Care Centres belonging to the Spanish Public Health System was recruited (January to March 2020). An analysis was performed to assess whether any of the items in the instrument showed different behaviours. All analyses were performed using AMOS® v.26 software. The results showed that the structure of the PAIN_Integral© Scale remained adequate when analysing its invariance in women and men, showing no metric, scalar and/or strict invariance. Therefore, these results indicated that the PAIN_Integral Scale© instrument has a different interpretation for women and men, identifying eight items with a singular functioning in both sexes and belonging to the subscales of proactivity, resilience and support network. These findings can be explained by gender stereotypes, since the dimensions where there are differences have an important social burden.
Reference86 articles.
1. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises;Raja;Pain,2020 2. Is aerobic exercise useful to manage chronic pain?;Cunha;Rev. Dor,2016 3. El-Metwally, A., Shaikh, Q., Aldiab, A., Al-Zahrani, J., Al-Ghamdi, S., Alrasheed, A.A., Househ, M., Da’ar, O.B., Nooruddin, S., and Razzak, H.A. (2019). The prevalence of chronic pain and its associated factors among Saudi Al-Kharj population; a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 20. 4. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (2023, September 10). Framework Document for Improving the Approach to Pain in the National Health System 2014, Available online: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/calidadAsistencial/estrategias/abordajeCronicidad/docs/CISNS_DocumentoMarcoDolor.pdf. 5. Sánchez-Jiménez, J., Tejedor-Varillas, A., Carrascal-Garrido, R., García-García, C.R., Gómez-García, S., González Sánchez, M., Javier Gallo Vallejo, F., Carlos Hermosa Hernán, J., Vargas Negrín, F., and Nieto-Pol, E. (2023, September 10). Care Patients Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (CNCP) Prim. Care (PC). Documento de Consenso. Available online: https://www.agamfec.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Documento-de-Consenso_La-atencio%CC%81n-al-paciente-con-DCNO-en-AP.pdf.
|
|