Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
2. United States Meat Animal Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA
Abstract
Early indicator traits for swine reproduction and longevity support economical selection decision-making. Activity is a key variable impacting a sow’s herd life and productivity. Early-life activities could contribute to farrowing traits including gestation length (GL), number born alive (NBA), and number weaned (NW). Beginning at 20 weeks of age, 480 gilts were video recorded for 7 consecutive days and processed using the NUtrack system. Activity traits included angle rotated (radians), average speed (m/s), distance traveled (m), time spent eating (s), lying lateral (s), lying sternal (s), standing (s), and sitting (s). Final daily activity values were averaged across the period under cameras. Parity one data were collected for all gilts considered. Data were analyzed using linear regression models (R version 4.0.2). GL was significantly impacted by angle rotated (p = 0.03), average speed (p = 0.07), distance traveled (p = 0.05), time spent lying lateral (p = 0.003), and lying sternal (0.02). NBA was significantly impacted by time spent lying lateral (p = 0.01), lying sternal (p = 0.07), and time spent sitting (p = 0.08). NW was significantly impacted by time spent eating (p = 0.09), time spent lying lateral (p = 0.04), and time spent sitting (p = 0.007). This analysis suggests early-life gilt activities are associated with sow productivity traits of importance. Further examination of the link between behaviors compiled utilizing NUtrack and reproductive traits is necessitated to further isolate behavioral differences for potential use in selection decisions.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference30 articles.
1. Sow longevity;Stalder;Pig News Inf.,2004
2. An economic analysis of sow retention in a United States breed-to-wean system;Gruhot;J. Swine Health Prod.,2017
3. Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis;Stalder;J. Swine Health Prod.,2003
4. Dhuyvetter, K.C. (2000). Optimal parity distribution—When is the best time to cull sows?. Kansas Agric. Exp. Station Res. Rep., 5–11.
5. Heritability estimates of sow productivity and litter performance;Blunn;J. Anim. Sci.,1949