Acclimation and Blood Sampling: Effects on Stress Markers in C57Bl/6J Mice

Author:

Marin Nerea1,Moragon Amparo2,Gil Domingo2ORCID,Garcia-Garcia Francisco3,Bisbal Viviana1

Affiliation:

1. Animal Facility IISLAFE, Hospital La Fe Research Institute, 46026 Valencia, Spain

2. Animal Facility CIPF, Prince Felipe Research Center, 46012 Valencia, Spain

3. Bioinformatics & Biostatistics Unit CIPF, Prince Felipe Research Center, 46012 Valencia, Spain

Abstract

Blood sampling in rodents is common practice in scientific studies. Some of the refined methods widely used are the puncture of the saphenous vein or tail vein, or even tail docking. The handling needs of these different blood sampling methods are different and can directly affect stress, increasing the variability of the study. Moreover, there is less aversion and stress if the animal is accustomed to the environment, handling and technique. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the influence of these three blood sampling techniques (saphenous puncture, tail vein puncture and tail vein docking) and the use of previous acclimation on different indicators of animal stress, assessing blood glucose concentrations and faecal corticosterone metabolites (FCMs). Twenty-four young adult male and female C57Bl6/J mice were divided in three groups by sampling method: tail docking (TD), saphenous vein puncture (SV) and caudal vein puncture (CV) groups. All mice were studied with and without acclimation, which was performed during 9 consecutive days. The results showed that both males and females present very similar responses to the different handling and sampling methods without significant differences. Nevertheless, acclimation in all sampling methods decreased glucose and FCM levels significantly. The method that obtained the lowest glucose and FCM levels with significance was saphenous vein puncture. Therefore, we can say that it causes less stress when performing prior acclimation, even when this involves greater handling of the animal. Our results contribute to refinement within the 3R concept and could serve researchers to programme and select a good handling technique and a welfare-friendly blood sampling method for their experiments.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference44 articles.

1. Happy animals make good science;Poole;Lab. Anim.,1997

2. Improving quality of science through better animal welfare: The NC3Rs strategy;Prescott;Lab Anim.,2017

3. National Centre for the Replacement Refinement & Reduction of Animal in Research (NC3Rs) (2013). Blood Sampling Mouse, NC3Rs.

4. Removal of blood from laboratory mammals and birds. First report of the BVA/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement;Morton;Lab. Anim.,1993

5. Dülsner, A., Hack, R., Krüger, C., Pils, M., Scherer, K., Schmelting, B., Schmidt, M., Weinert, H., and Jourdan, T. (2017). Recommendation for Blood Sampling in Laboratory Animals, Especially Small Laboratory Animals, Gesellschaft für Versuchstierkunde.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3