Abstract
Extensive brittle failures in the weld zone of the beam bottom flange in composite joints of SMRFs were observed during the Northridge earthquake and the Kobe earthquake. One of the main reasons is the large tensile strain demand generated at the beam bottom flange zone under positive bending. The key to accurately understanding the mechanical properties of composite joints is the effective width of the slab. However, researchers have no consensus on the flange slab’s effective width for composite joints, even with the simplest solid concrete slab. Therefore, the best way to design the composite joint specimen is by following the current design specifications. However, each specification implements different ideas and approaches for specifying an effective slab width. This paper presents comparisons of the effective flange width provisions in China, the United States, Australia/New Zealand, and the European Union. The characteristics of each provision are briefly described and summarized. Numerical comparisons for positive and negative moment regions of continuous spans follow. Based on the commonalities and main differences among all these provisions, we propose a recommended equation for calculating the effective width of a solid concrete slab, reflecting the specification differences. The reliability of the recommended equation was verified with ABAQUS software analysis. The recommended equation can meet the fast and secure design requirements for composite joints in tests with concrete slabs.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献