Reliability of a Custom Device Used to Measure Isometric Knee Flexor and Extensor Strength in Standing Position

Author:

Minuti Tommaso12,Cigni Paolo345,Costagli Michele5,Cucini Alessandro5,Cione Erika67ORCID,Melotto Samuele8,Rapetti Stefano8,Ricotti Leonardo12,Cannataro Roberto4789ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy

2. Department of Excellence in Robotics & AI, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy

3. Auxilium Vitae Volterra Spa, Borgo San Lazzaro, 5, 56048 Volterra, Italy

4. Italian Society of Nutrition, Sports and Well-Being (SINSeB), Via Luigi Cherubini, 2, 50053 Empoli, Italy

5. Fisioclinic Dott. Paolo Cigni, Via Porta Massetana 1, 56045 Pomarance, Italy

6. Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy

7. Galascreen Laboratories, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy

8. Associazione Calcio Milan, Via Aldo Rossi 8, 20149 Milano, Italy

9. Research Division, Dynamical Business & Science Society—DBSS International SAS, Bogotá 110311, Colombia

Abstract

Background: Assessing lower limb strength in the field is problematic, as the “gold standard assessment” with isokinetic strength is cumbersome, and the device is costly and not transportable and keeps the angle of the hip at around 90°. Methods: We evaluated isometric muscle strength in a standing position with the help of an exoskeleton that holds the subject and makes the test easily repeatable. Results: The optimal device angles for hip and knee were, respectively, 20° and 80° for flexor tests and 30° and 40° for extensor tests. Test–retest reliability was very high for the right knee extensor (ICC 0.96–0.98), left knee extensor (ICC 0.96–0.97), right knee flexor (ICC 0.91–0.96), and left knee flexor (ICC 0.96–0.97). Furthermore, the typical error in percent (T.E.%) ranged from 2.50 to 5.50%, and the change in the mean in percent ranged from 0.84 to 7.72%, making it possible to determine even a slight variation in force. Conclusions: this new method could represent a valid alternative for assessing strength, due to the high reliability and the favorable joint position, particularly in football.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Paleontology,Space and Planetary Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3