The Human City: The Development of an Easy-to-Use Assessment Method Calibrated to Swedish Conditions

Author:

Woxnerud William1,Najar Karim23ORCID,Nylander Ola4

Affiliation:

1. Independent Researcher, 661 30 Säffle, Sweden

2. Department of Biotechnology and Health, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden

3. Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences, Karlstad University, 651 88 Karlstad, Sweden

4. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

Sustainability encompasses three dimensions: environmental, economic, and social. Among these dimensions, social sustainability presents the most challenging definition and measurement, leading to its frequent neglect. There is therefore a need to increase the measurability of social sustainability. There are several methods for measuring social sustainability, but we can broadly categorize them into two groups: those that are simple and easy to use, and those that are more comprehensive but more challenging to use. Furthermore, there can be a case for increasing the local adaptation of assessment methods regarding social sustainability. In this study, a new easy-to-use assessment method is developed and calibrated to Swedish conditions. We created a total of 40 questions, evenly distributed across 8 categories: architecture and aesthetics, places to meet, social infrastructure, accessibility, traffic, security, senses and experience, and development. The new method strives to be evidence-based and adapted to Swedish conditions. The study resulted in an easy-to-use assessment method adapted to local conditions that can be suitable for simple evaluations of social sustainability in the design of public places. It can be particularly useful when laymen need to understand where the place’s strengths and weaknesses lie in a social context. Since the method is based on subjective assessments, an interesting future study could investigate whether different people can achieve the same results with the developed assessment method.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference93 articles.

1. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability;Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy,2012

2. Social sustainability: A review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods;Colantonio;Int. J. Environ. Cult. Econ. Soc. Sustain.,2009

3. The forgotten pillar: A definition for the measurement of social sustainability in American cities;Opp;Local Environ.,2017

4. Dillard, J., Dujon, V., and King, M.C. (2008). Social sustainability: An organizational-level analysis. Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability, Routledge.

5. Enhancing social sustainability through the planning of third places: A theory-based framework;Goosen;Soc. Indic. Res.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3