Communicative Framework Development for Construction Risk Governance: An Analysis of Risk and Trust Perception for Organizational Sustainability

Author:

Hinsberg Katrina1ORCID,Nadesan Majia2,Lamanna Anthony3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA

2. School of Social Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA

3. Del E. Webb School of Construction, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA

Abstract

In the construction industry, risk governance stems from the standardization of safety policies and procedures. Safety governance is typically communicated and enforced through a top-down, command-and-control approach. Procedures and policies are created at the top level and cascaded down to the work. Individual discretion in the workplace permits a choice for worker adherence to safety procedures. Through a literature review, this study identified risk perception as a significant variable in regulatory compliance and fidelity. Individual hazard assessments and risk behaviors are often based on subjective cognitive risk perceptions rather than organizational governance policy. In the current governance system, there is a misalignment of risk perceptions and failure in trust between the workforce and the regulatory process. This study examines the impact of risk perceptions on safety compliance and promotes a more participative risk governance process for sustainable construction practices. A participative framework model is proposed to help align worker risk perceptions with organizational governance through policy creation, policy compliance and stakeholder participation and feedback. Utilizing proper discourse and cyclical communication, the proposed framework aims to increase safety fidelity, compliance, and trust in the construction industry through a more inclusive and collaborative governance strategy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2024, May 24). Construction Industry, Available online: https://www.osha.gov/construction#:~:text=Construction%20workers%20engage%20in%20many,%2C%20silica%20dust%2C%20and%20asbestos.

2. Crisis communication in construction: Organizational strategies for worksite fatalities;Hinsberg;J. Saf. Res.,2024

3. PMI (Project Management Institute) (2013). The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), PMI. [5th ed.].

4. Risk identification and common risks in construction: Literature review and content analysis;Siraj;J. Constr. Eng. Manag.,2019

5. Systematic risk management approach for construction projects;Crandall;J. Constr. Eng. Manag.,1990

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3