Abstract
This essay is in four parts. The first offers a critique of James Elkins and Michael Newman’s book The State of Art Criticism (Routledge, 2008) for what it tells us about art criticism in academia and journalism and feminism; the second considers how a gendered analysis measures the “state” of art and art criticism as a feminist intervention; and the third, how neo-liberal mis-readings of Linda Nochlin and Laura Mulvey in the art world represent feminism in ideas about “greatness” and the “gaze”, whilst avoiding feminist arguments about women artists or their work, particularly on “motherhood”. In the fourth part, against the limits of the first three, the state of feminist art criticism across the last fifty years is reconsidered by highlighting the plurality of feminisms in transnational, transgenerational and progressive alliances.
Reference96 articles.
1. The Parent Trap: What Are the Economics Involved When Artists Have Children?
https://frieze.com/article/parent-trap
2. Against globalization: Aesthetics after the end of the globe
3. Textual Strategies: The Politics of Art Making
4. The Death of the Author
http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/index.html
5. Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics;Battersby,1989
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献