Deprescribing Strategies: A Prospective Study on Proton Pump Inhibitors

Author:

Calvini Giulia12,Baiardi Giammarco12ORCID,Mattioli Francesca12ORCID,Milano Giulia3ORCID,Calautti Francesca4,Zunino Alessia4,Fraguglia Carla4,Caccavale Fabio5,Lantieri Francesca6ORCID,Antonucci Giancarlo7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine, 14, 16128 Genoa, Italy

2. Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 2, 16132 Genoa, Italy

3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy

4. S.C. Farmacia Interna, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine, 14, 16128 Genoa, Italy

5. Chartered Accountancy and Advisory Firm, Piazza Remondini 3, 16131 Genoa, Italy

6. Biostatistics Unit, Health Science Department, University of Genoa, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genoa, Italy

7. Internal Medicine Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura Delle Cappuccine, 14, 16128 Genoa, Italy

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most controversially prescribed drugs in polypharmacy. This observational prospective study assessed the PPI prescriptive trend during hospitalization before and after implementation of a prescribing/deprescribing algorithm in a real-life hospital setting and the related clinical–economic benefit at discharge. PPI prescriptive trends were compared between three quarters of 2019 (9 months) and the same period of 2018 by a chi-square test with a Yate’s correction. The proportions of treated patients in the two years (1120 discharged patients in 2018 and 1107 in 2019) were compared by the Cochran–Armitage trend test. DDDs (defined daily doses) were compared between 2018 and 2019 by the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test and normalizing DDD/DOT (days of therapy) and DDD/100 bd (bed days) for each patient. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on PPI prescriptions at discharge. The distribution of patients with PPIs at discharge was significantly different in the two years (p = 0.0121). There was a downward trend in the number of PPI prescriptions (29.9%) in the third trimester of 2019 compared to the others of the same year (first trimester: 34.1%, second trimester: 36.0%) and by contrast with the same periods of 2018 (29.4, 36.0, and 34.7%) (p = 0.0124). DDDs/patient did not differ between 2018 and 2019 nor across the three trimesters. However, both DDD/DOT and DDD/100 bd showed a decrease in the third trimester of 2019, with a marked difference for DDD/DOT (p = 0.0107). The reduction in consumption detected in the last phase of 2019 in terms of DDD/DOT was 0.09 with a consequent containment of pharmaceutical spending. The development and implementation of multidisciplinary prescribing/deprescribing protocols in both hospital and community settings could lead to a reduction in the misuse of PPIs, with significant savings in healthcare resources.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3