COVID-19 Patients’ Medication Management during Transition of Care from Hospital to Virtual Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Audit

Author:

Hattingh H. Laetitia123ORCID,Edmunds Catherine4,Buksh Saberina5,Cronin Sean5,Gillespie Brigid M.67

Affiliation:

1. Allied Health Research, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia

2. School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia

3. School of Pharmacy, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia

4. Medical Services, Clinical Governance and Research, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia

5. Pharmacy Department, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia

6. NHMRC Wiser Wounds CRE, MHIQ, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia

7. Nursing and Midwifery Education and Research Unit, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia

Abstract

Background: Virtual models of care were implemented to ease hospital bed pressure during COVID-19. We evaluated the medication management of COVID-19 patients transferred to virtual models of care. Method: A retrospective audit of COVID-19 patients transferred from inpatient units to virtual care during January 2022 and surveys from patients transferred during December 2021–February 2022 was carried out. Results: One hundred patients were randomly selected: mean age 59 years (SD: 19.8), mean number of medicines at admission 4.3 (SD: 4.03), mean length of virtual ward stay 4.4 days (SD: 2.1). Pharmacists reviewed 43% (43/100) of patients’ medications during their hospital stay and provided 29% (29/100) with discharge medicine lists at transfer. Ninety-two (92%) patients were prescribed at least one new high-risk medicine whilst in hospital, but this was not a factor considered to receive a pharmacist medication review. Forty patients (40%) were discharged on newly commenced high-risk medicines, and this was also not a factor in receiving a pharmacist discharge medication list. In total, 25% of patient surveys (96/378) were returned: 70% (66/96) reported adequate medicine information at transfer and 55% (52/96) during the virtual model period. Conclusion: Patient survey data show overall positive experiences of medication management and support. Audit data highlight gaps in medication management during the transfer to a virtual model, highlighting the need for patient prioritisation.

Funder

Gold Coast Hospital Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3