Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China
2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract
Geographical indication (GI) offers a unique protection scheme to preserve high-quality agricultural products and support rural sustainability at the territorial level. However, not all the areas with traditional agricultural products are acknowledged with a GI. Quantifying the contribution of each factor to geographical indication agricultural products (GIAPs) can facilitate the formulation of effective policies to improve rural livelihoods. In this study, the random forest (RF) model was applied to investigate the contribution of multi-perspective factors, including nature, society, agriculture and market, on the distribution of GIAPs, and examined the driving causes using interpretable approaches. The empirical findings demonstrate that the RF model is able to accurately capture most of the important factors characterizing GIAPs and to make out-of-sample predictions of the study units which obtain GIs. This study revealed that natural conditions and market demand were contributing aspects to the disparity of GIAPs in Northeast China. The order of determinants was the category of online GIAPs (CatOn) > the number of online GIAPs (NumOn) > the area of black soil (BlaSoil) > the distance to offline stores selling GIAPs (DisOff). Of these, GIAPs was lower than ybase in parts of districts of Jilin and Heilongjiang Provinces when the area of black soil (BlaSoil) gradually increased. When the category and number of online GIAPs (CatOn and NumOn) were less than 20 and 5, respectively, GIAPs were enhanced, especially for 40% of the districts in Liaoning Province. Deepening understanding of GIAPs helps to better target and tailor sustainable development policies.
Funder
Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference66 articles.
1. Revitalize the World’s Countryside;Liu;Nature,2017
2. FAO (2017). Leveraging Food Systems for Inclusive Rural Transformation, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of Food and Agriculture.
3. Rural Revitalization through Territorial Distinctiveness: The Use of Geographical Indications in Turkey;Nizam;J. Rural. Stud.,2022
4. Vandecandelaere, E., Arfini, F., Belletti, G., and Marescotti, A. (2009). Linking People, Places and Products: A Guide for Promoting Quality Linked to Geographical Origin and Sustainable Geo-Graphical Indications, FAO.
5. Environmental Effects of Geographical Indications and Their Influential Factors: A Review of the Empirical Evidence;Milano;Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain.,2021