Abstract
Citizenship is popularly associated with able-bodiedness, both physically and cognitively. However, disability studies over the last few decades has revealed the extent to which the idea of the nation as composed of able-bodied constituents is little more than fantasy, one that can create or galvanize barriers to full political and social participation. Part of this task has involved re-evaluating key works of canonical literature through the lens of disability. In the following paper, I apply this approach to Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot and argue that Beckett’s play disrupts not just the fantasy of a nation composed of able-bodied citizens but the language of able-bodiedness itself, which has implications for how we conceive of citizenship and participatory politics. While impairment has been critiqued in Beckett before, the extensive examples of pained and impaired characters in his works have often been subsumed under broader philosophical themes, such as existentialism, nihilism, or Cartesian dualism, and rarely linked to issues of citizenship, politics, or the social and built environment. I explore how Beckett’s approach to theatrical and linguistic performativity contributes to how he staged the experience of pain and disability that has implications for how we conceive of and practice citizenship.
Reference23 articles.
1. Beckett, Samuel Edited with a Foreword by Ruby Cobn. E-Book. Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment, 1984.
2. Beckett, Samuel Waiting for Godot, 1994.
3. How to Do Nothing with Words, or Waiting for Godot as Performativity;Begam;Modern Drama,2007
4. Tanaka, Mariko Hori, Tajiri, Yoshiki, and Tsushima, Michiko “That or Groan”: Paining and De-Paining in Beckett. Samuel Beckett and Pain, 2012.
5. Burgett, Bruce Sentimental Bodies: Sex, Gender, and Citizenship in the Early Republic, 1998.