Abstract
This brief study addresses the controversial issue of the relationship with the body, with the flesh, on the part of pagan and Christian thinkers at a particularly important point in their evolution, in the late fourth and early fifth centuries, a time in which Neoplatonic thinkers had to defend their doctrinal positions against the increasingly hegemonic position of the triumphant Christianity. In this sense, it is particularly interesting to approach the perspective of two authors who are not strictly speaking philosophers: in particular, Synesius of Cyrene, a thinker in the Neoplatonic tradition who became a Christian bishop, complemented also by some interesting reflections by Eunapius of Sardis, historian and biographer of Neoplatonic philosophers. In the light of this analysis, it becomes clear that the discussion on the value of the body and carnality is an essential point of doctrinal discrepancy in this period and, contrary to what sometimes appears, the discrepancy also pertains to the formation of the intellectual, and Christianity clearly appears as a doctrine obsessed with the flesh to the detriment of the soul.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Reference51 articles.
1. Harmonia entre saber e prazer ou A conciliação entre Aspásia e Sócrates: Commentário em torno do Dion 58d-59a, de Sinésio de Cirene;Azevedo;Euphrosyne,2003
2. On Goulet’s Chronology of Eunapius’ Life and Works;Banchich;Journal of Hellenic Studies,1987
3. Varieties of the ancient Greek body-soul distinction;Rhizai,2006
4. Blockley, Roger C. (1981). The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire. Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus, Francis Cairns.
5. Bonazzi, Mauro (2003). Academici e Platonici: Il Dibattito Antico Sullo Scetticismo di Platone, LED Edizioni Universitarie.