Abstract
The world is moving towards a low-carbon economy through renewable energy sources. In this context, concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies can exploit the rich solar resource in Brazil, diversifying the national electricity mix. The aim of this paper is to support the insertion of CSP generation in the Brazilian bottom-up model MATRIZ by analyzing the environmental performance of three CSP technologies: (i) solar tower power (STP) with a thermal storage system (TSS) of 7.5 h; (ii) solar thermal parabolic trough (STPT) with a TSS of 6 h; and (iii) STPT without TSS. From a life cycle perspective, their freshwater consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are addressed by employing the software SimaPro, the Ecoinvent database, and the ReCiPe 2016 method, as well as information from the system advisory model (SAM) and the literature. As a result, STP is the most environmentally sound CSP alternative, presenting lower GHG emissions and water consumption than the two STPT technologies. In general, CSP generation proves to be more environmentally attractive than some fossil-fired power plants and renewable energy sources. Moreover, moving the manufacturing of CSP technologies to Brazil has the potential to reduce GHG emissions from the upstream processes of their value chain.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference60 articles.
1. (2016). Renewable Energy: Hydro, Biomass, Wind, Solar, Ocean, Brazilian Energy Research Office.
2. Brazil (2020). Brazilian Energy Balance 2020, Brazilian Energy Research Office.
3. Brazil (2021). The Ten-Year Energy Expansion Plan 2030, Brazilian Energy Research Office.
4. Impacts of intermittent renewables on electricity generation system operation;Batlle;Econ. Energy Environ. Policy,2012
5. Trama, C.P., Júnior, A.O.P., Guimarães, A.P.C., Diniz, A.L., and Vieira, L.D.S.R. (2021). Cost–benefit analysis of solar thermal plants with storage in a hydrothermal system. Energies, 14.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献