Affiliation:
1. Chemical Characterization Solutions, LLC, P.O. Box 113, Newport, MN 55055, USA
Abstract
The thermodynamic and kinetic contributions to the over-extraction of extractables by nonpolar organic solvents relative to biological lipids in exhaustive and exaggerated extractions of medical devices are studied based on the Abraham solvation model and solvent–material interactions, using low-density polyethylene (LDPE) as an exemplary material. The thermodynamic effect is evaluated by the partition constant of extractables between LDPE and extraction solvents, hexane and lipids, defined as the concentration in the polymer phase divided by the concentration in the solvent phase. The Abraham solvation model is used to correlate the measured LDPE-lipid partition constant (log10Pldpe/lipid) to construct the predictive model. Similar models are also derived from the thermodynamic cycle conversion, using the system constants of LDPE-water and Lipid-water partition systems. These constructed models, together with the predictive LDPE-hexane (log10Pldpe/hexane) model established from a previous study, are used to predict and compare the ranges and values of Pldpe/s (s = lipids and hexane) for the observed LDPE extractables over a wide hydrophobicity range in log10Po/w from zero to 30. The solvent-LDPE interactions are examined by the degree of swelling of LDPE by hexane (or other nonpolar solvents) and lipids, including the solvent diffusion rates into the material. These parameters allow the evaluation of kinetic effect on the over-extraction. The extent of over-extraction is compiled directly by experimental “overall” or “specific” migration data or indirectly calculated by the diffusion coefficient of extractables when extracted by hexane or lipids. It is concluded from this study that the extractables distribution between LDPE and lipids highly favors the lipid phase thermodynamically (Pldpe/lipid<1), and the values of Pldpe/lipid are always lower than those of Pldpe/hexane, thereby indicating that the thermodynamic effect is not the cause of over-extraction. It is the kinetic effect that dominantly contributes to the over-extraction, as supported by the material swelling and solvent diffusion rates. Finally, the extent of over-extraction has been established from a few folds to over a hundred-fold, and the median value is 7. Furthermore, the methods adopted and developed in this study can be invaluable tools in other disciplines such as the reliable prediction of extractables from other device materials and environmental sampling.
Reference98 articles.
1. Biocompatibility assessments for medical devices—Evolving regulatory considerations;Reeve;Expert Rev. Med. Devices,2017
2. Leachables from plastic materials in contact with drugs. State of the art and review of current analytical approaches;Int. J. Pharm.,2020
3. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 18: Chemical Characterization of Medical Device Materials within a Risk Management Process (Standard No. ISO10993-18:2020). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/64750.html.
4. Overview of Biocompatible Materials and Their Use in Medicine;Kiradzhiyska;Folia Med.,2019
5. Polymer additives;Marturano;Phys. Sci. Rev.,2017
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献