Abstract
This article is an overview of recent progress on a theory of games, whose payoffs are probability distributions rather than real numbers, and which have their equilibria defined and computed over a (suitably restricted yet dense) set of distributions. While the classical method of defining game models with real-valued utility functions has proven strikingly successful in many domains, some use cases from the security area revealed shortcomings of the classical real-valued game models. These issues motivated the use of probability distributions as a more complex object to express revenues. The resulting class of games displays a variety of phenomena not encountered in classical games, such as games that have continuous payoff functions but still no equilibrium, or games that are zero-sum but for which fictitious play does not converge. We discuss suitable restrictions of how such games should be defined to allow the definition of equilibria, and show the notion of a lexicographic Nash equilibrium, as a proposed solution concept in this generalized class of games.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Statistics and Probability
Reference45 articles.
1. Copula-Based Actuarial Model for Pricing Cyber-Insurance Policies;Herath;Insur. Mark. Co.,2011
2. Hogg, R.V., and Klugman, S.A. (1984). Loss Distributions, Wiley.
3. AlShawish, A. (2021). Risk-Based Security Management in Critical Infrastructure Organizations. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Passau].
4. Tambe, M. (2012). Security and Game Theory: Algorithms, Deployed Systems, Lessons Learned, Cambridge University Press.
5. Pawlick, J., and Zhu, Q. (2021). Game Theory for Cyber Deception: From Theory to Applications, Springer International Publishing.