Comparative Performance of Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning Algorithms in Predicting Gas–Liquid Flow Regimes

Author:

Hafsa NoorORCID,Rushd SayeedORCID,Yousuf Hazzaz

Abstract

Gas–liquid flow is a significant phenomenon in various engineering applications, such as in nuclear reactors, power plants, chemical industries, and petroleum industries. The prediction of the flow patterns is of great importance for designing and analyzing the operations of two-phase pipeline systems. The traditional numerical and empirical methods that have been used for the prediction are known to result in a high inaccuracy for scale-up processes. That is why various artificial intelligence-based (AI-based) methodologies are being applied, at present, to predict the gas–liquid flow regimes. We focused in the current study on a thorough comparative analysis of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in predicting the flow regimes with the application of a diverse set of ML and DL frameworks to a database comprising 11,837 data points, which were collected from thirteen independent experiments. During the pre-processing, the big data analysis was performed to analyze the correlations among the parameters and extract important features. The comparative analysis of the AI-based models’ performances was conducted using precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, Cohen’s kappa, and receiver operating characteristics curves. The extreme gradient boosting method was identified as the optimum model for predicting the two-phase flow regimes in inclined or horizontal pipelines.

Funder

King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Process Chemistry and Technology,Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous),Bioengineering

Reference76 articles.

1. Intelligent image-based gas-liquid two-phase flow regime recognition;Ghanbarzadeh;J. Fluids Eng.,2012

2. Strand, A., Smith, I.E., Unander, T.E., Steinsland, I., and Hellevik, L.R. (2020). Uncertainty Propagation through a Point Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Pipe Flow. Algorithms, 13.

3. Bjørlo, I. (2013). Uncertainty in Multiphase Flow Estimates for a Field Development Case. [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology]. Available online: https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/235160/648709_FULLTEXT01.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

4. Klinkert, J. (2018). The Characterization of Uncertainty for Steady State Multiphase Flow Models in Pipelines. [Master’s Thesis, Delft University of Technology]. Available online: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:4968494c-464e-46f9-b635-5828cedaadfa.

5. Posluszny, D., Klavetter, K., Cremaschi, S., Sarica, C., and Subramani, H.J. (2010, January 2–4). Uncertainty Analysis of Multiphase Flow Modelling: A Case Study for Vertical Flows. Proceedings of the 7th North American Conference on Multiphase Technology, Banff, AB, Canada.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3