Affiliation:
1. Department of Theology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA
Abstract
While both narrative and performance criticisms take whole-story approaches to the texts they are engaging with, performance critical approaches are uniquely suited to considerations of the body, and particularly of gender. Alongside the growth in performance critical analyses of the gospels that place prominence on the embodied, performed dimension of the texts, when thinking about gender it becomes critical to examine the ways in which masculinity is constructed in and through performance, particularly in the ancient Greek and Roman worlds. This article is an examination of the masculinity of Jesus as it is presented in the Gospel of Mark, as it argues that the Gospel of Mark presents a seemingly “unmasculine” depiction of Jesus that performers (as well as later interpreters) would have had to make performance choices about in their own depictions of Jesus for a given performance event. While narrative approaches have more space to hold multiple interpretations in tension with one another, performances of the texts would have necessitated making singular choices that would impact an audience’s understanding of the text.
Reference42 articles.
1. Asikainen, Susanna (2018). Jesus and Other Men: Ideal Masculinities in the Synoptic Gospels, Brill.
2. Aune, David (1990). Greeks, Romans, and Christians: Essays in Honor of Abraham J, Augsburg Fortress.
3. Bhabha, Homi K. (1994). The Location of Culture, Routledge.
4. Boomershine, Thomas E., and Bartholomew, Adam Gilbert (2015). The Messiah of Peace: A Performance-Criticism Commentary on Mark’s Passion-Resurrection Narrative, Cascade Books. Biblical Performance Criticism Series 12.
5. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory;Butler;Theatre Journal,1988
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Jesus: A Life in Class Conflict;Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus;2024-03-07