Robust Multiobjective Decision Making in the Acquisition of Energy Assets
Author:
Bambirra Rafael12ORCID, Schiavo Lais3, Lima Marina3, Miranda Giovanna3, Reis Iolanda4, Cassemiro Michael4, Andrade Antônio4, Laender Fernanda4, Silva Rafael5, Vieira Douglas3, Ekel Petr26ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Programa de pós Graduação em Engenharia Elétrica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais—UFMG, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil 2. ASOTECH, Belo Horizonte 30535-630, Brazil 3. ENACOM, Belo Horizonte 31275-100, Brazil 4. Aliança Energia, Belo Horizonte 30170-050, Brazil 5. VALE, Nova Lima 34000-000, Brazil 6. Programa de pós Graduação em Informática, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais—PUC/MG, Belo Horizonte 30535-901, Brazil
Abstract
In asset management for energy portfolios, quantitative methodologies are typically employed. In Brazil, the NEWAVE computational model is universally used to generate scenarios of hydraulic production and future prices, which result in revenue distributions. These distributions are then used to estimate the portfolio’s revenue and assess its risk. Although this is a well-established analysis, it has some shortcomings that are not always considered. The validity of the revenue series constructed by NEWAVE, especially in long-term analysis, is a real problem for agents concerning the acquisition of assets such as power plants. Another issue is the disregard for other objectives that are important for the operationality of the management task and are often ignored, such as operational risk. To address these limitations, this work combines the areas of multicriteria decision making under uncertainty and risk management and presents a methodology for evaluating the acquisition of long-term energy assets, as well as a practical application of the proposed method. Investment alternatives are evaluated in multiple developed scenarios, so it is possible to measure how robust a given option is. By analyzing several scenarios simultaneously, a larger region of uncertainties can be covered, and therefore, decision making becomes more secure. The proposed methodology includes six objectives, designed to address a wider range of stakeholder needs. This approach is applied to an illustrative portfolio, producing results that allow for a more comprehensive understanding of decision attributes. Therefore, this work not only addresses the current limitations in the field but also adds an original contribution by considering simultaneously several scenarios and integrating multiple objectives in a robust and secure decision-making framework.
Funder
Aliança Energia National Council for Scientific and Technological Development Minas Gerais State Agency for Research and Development
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference42 articles.
1. Božić, Z., Dobromirov, D., Arsić, J., Radišić, M., and Ślusarczyk, B. (2020). Power Exchange Prices: Comparison of Volatility in European Markets. Energies, 13. 2. Energy risk management and value at risk modeling;Sadeghi;Energy Policy,2006 3. Energy price risk management;Weron;Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl.,2000 4. Chawda, S., Bhakar, R., and Mathuria, P. (2016, January 19–21). Uncertainty and risk management in electricity market: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the 2016 National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), Bhubaneswar, India. 5. Risk assessment in energy trading;Dahlgren;IEEE Trans. Power Syst.,2003
|
|