Assessing Machine Learning Techniques for Intrusion Detection in Cyber-Physical Systems
Author:
Santos Vinícius F.1, Albuquerque Célio1, Passos Diego12, Quincozes Silvio E.34ORCID, Mossé Daniel5
Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Computação, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24210-346, Brazil 2. ISEL—Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1549-020 Lisboa, Portugal 3. Campus Alegrete, Universidade Federal do Pampa, Bagé 96460-000, Brazil 4. Faculdade de Computação (FACOM), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil 5. Computer Science Department, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
Abstract
Cyber-physical systems (CPS) are vital to key infrastructures such as Smart Grids and water treatment, and are increasingly vulnerable to a broad spectrum of evolving attacks. Whereas traditional security mechanisms, such as encryption and firewalls, are often inadequate for CPS architectures, the implementation of Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) tailored for CPS has become an essential strategy for securing them. In this context, it is worth noting the difference between traditional offline Machine Learning (ML) techniques and understanding how they perform under different IDS applications. To answer these questions, this article presents a novel comparison of five offline and three online ML algorithms for intrusion detection using seven CPS-specific datasets, revealing that offline ML is superior when attack signatures are present without time constraints, while online techniques offer a quicker response to new attacks. The findings provide a pathway for enhancing CPS security through a balanced and effective combination of ML techniques.
Funder
CNPq FAPERJ CAPES/PRINT 001 Laboratory for Physical Sciences
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference37 articles.
1. Quincozes, S.E., Passos, D., Albuquerque, C., Ochi, L.S., and Mossé, D. (2020, January 7–9). GRASP-Based Feature Selection for Intrusion Detection in CPS Perception Layer. Proceedings of the 2020 4th Conference on Cloud and Internet of Things (CIoT), Niteroi, Brazil. 2. Unsupervised and incremental learning orchestration for cyber-physical security;Reis;Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol.,2020 3. Goh, J., Adepu, S., Junejo, K.N., and Mathur, A. (2016, January 10–12). A Dataset to Support Research in the Design of Secure Water Treatment Systems. Proceedings of the Critical Information Infrastructures Security, 11th International Conference, CRITIS 2016, Paris, France. 4. Obert, J., Cordeiro, P., Johnson, J.T., Lum, G., Tansy, T., Pala, N., and Ih, R. (2019). Recommendations for Trust and Encryption in DER Interoperability Standards, Sandia National Lab (SNL-NM). Technical Report. 5. WSN-DS: A dataset for intrusion detection systems in wireless sensor networks;Almomani;J. Sensors,2016
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|