Clinical Study and Serological Diagnosis of Vector-Borne Pathogens in Sardinian Dogs
-
Published:2024-07-12
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:313
-
ISSN:2306-7381
-
Container-title:Veterinary Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Veterinary Sciences
Author:
Chisu Valentina1ORCID, Tanda Antonio1, Sechi Sara2ORCID, Pinna Parpaglia Maria Luisa2ORCID, Masu Gabriella1, Loi Federica3ORCID, Masala Giovanna1
Affiliation:
1. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale “G. Pegreffi” della Sardegna, Via Duca degli Abruzzi 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy 2. Teaching Veterinary Hospital, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, 07100 Sassari, Italy 3. Osservatorio Epidemiologico Veterinario Regionale della Sardegna, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, 07100 Sassari, Italy
Abstract
Canine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) comprise a group of infectious diseases caused by a wide range of pathogens transmitted by arthropod vectors. Clinical signs commonly involve symptoms such as fever, anorexia, weight loss, blood disorders, hepatosplenomegaly, and others that can lead to death in dogs with comorbidities. Some pathogens responsible for CVBDs constitute a serious threat to human health due to their zoonotic transmission. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of zoonotic vector-borne diseases (Rickettsia rickettsii, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, Bartonella henselae, and Leishmania infantum) in domestic Sardinian dogs with and without clinical signs of these pathogens. Blood serum samples were collected from 142 dogs and examined through serological analysis. Clinical signs suggestive of these pathogens were also evaluated. The results obtained showed that 33 (33/140; 23.6%), 22 (22/134; 16.4%), 14 (14/142; 9.9%), 20 (20/66; 30.3%), and 26 (26/108; 24.1%) dogs were seropositive for Rickettsia sp., Anaplasma sp., Ehrlichia sp., Bartonella sp., and Leishmania sp. antibodies, respectively. Among these dogs, 12 dogs presented with at least one clinical sign (8.5%), while 18 (12.7%) showed more than two symptoms at the same time. Furthermore, among the asymptomatic dogs (93/142; 65.5%), 13% (n = 12) tested positive for A. phagocytophilum, 12% (n = 11) tested positive for B. henselae, 9% (n = 8) tested positive for E. canis, 12% (n = 11) tested positive for L. infantum, and 19% (n = 18) tested positive for R. rickettsii. This survey represents the first study assessing different canine vector-borne pathogens in dogs from North Sardinia. Since the pathogens detected here represent emerging zoonotic diseases, these results highlight the need to undertake further studies to increase the knowledge of these under-reported vector-borne pathogens in Sardinia.
Reference44 articles.
1. Mendoza-Roldan, J.A., Benelli, G., Bezerra-Santos, M.A., Nguyen, V.L., Conte, G., Iatta, R., Furlanello, T., and Otranto, D. (2021). Seropositivity to canine tick-borne pathogens in a population of sick dogs in Italy. Parasit. Vectors, 14. 2. Vector-borne pathogens in dogs of different regions of Iran and Pakistan;Iatta;Parasitol. Res.,2021 3. Otranto, D., and Dantas-Torres, F. (2010). Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: Current situation and perspectives. Parasit. Vectors, 3. 4. Dantas-Torres, F., and Otranto, D. (2014). Dogs, cats, parasites, and humans in Brazil: Opening the black box. Parasit. Vectors, 7, Erratum in Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 298. 5. Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: Part one;Otranto;Trends Parasitol.,2009
|
|