Abstract
Urban planners have been long interested in understanding how urban structure and activities are mutually influenced. Human mobility and economic activities naturally drive the formation of road network structure and the accessibility of the latter shapes the patterns of movement flow across urban space. In this paper, we perform an exploratory study on the relationship between the street network structure and the intensity of human movement in urban areas. We focus on two cities and we utilize a dataset of geo-tagged tweets that can form a proxy to urban mobility and the corresponding street networks as obtained from OpenStreetMap. We apply three network centrality measures, including closeness, betweenness and straightness centrality, calculated at a global or local scale, as well as under mixed or individual transportation mode (e.g., driving, biking and walking) with its directional accessibility, to uncover the structural properties of urban street networks. We further design an urban area transition network and apply PageRank to capture the intensity of human mobility. Our correlation analysis indicates different centrality metrics have different levels of correlation with the intensity of human movement. The closeness centrality consistently shows the highest correlation (with a coefficient around 0.6) with human movement intensity when calculated at a global scale, while straightness centrality often shows no correlation at the global scale or weaker correlation ρ≈0.4 at the local scale. The correlation levels further depend on the type of directional accessibility and of various types of transportation modes. Hence, the directionality and transportation mode, largely ignored in the analysis of road networks, are crucial. Furthermore, the strength of the correlation varies in the two cities examined, indicating potential differences in urban spatial structure and human mobility patterns.
Funder
Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Computers in Earth Sciences,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference59 articles.
1. Hillier, B., Turner, A., Yang, T., and Park, H.T. (2009). Metric and topo-geometric properties of urban street networks: Some convergences, divergences and new results. J. Space Syntax. Stud., in press.
2. Rodrigue, J. (2013). Transportation and the Urban Form. Chapter 6, The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge. [3rd ed.].
3. Reading the urban socio-spatial network through space syntax and geo-tagged Twitter data;Iranmanesh;J. Urban Des.,2020
4. Rodrigue, J.P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge.
5. Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance;Stouffer;Am. Sociol. Rev.,1940