Conditions of Sustainable Welfare: A Cross-Case Empirical Analysis of 22 Locality-Based Welfare Systems in Decentralised Indonesia

Author:

Tobing-David Virna Emily1ORCID,Adi Isbandi Rukminto1,Nuryana Mu’man2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Welfare, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia

2. Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta 10340, Indonesia

Abstract

The existing body of knowledge underpinning welfare state theory suggests that most welfare systems depend on growth. It signifies that the state–market mechanism is a prerequisite for achieving welfare. However, the current ecological crisis highlights the detrimental effects of unchecked economic growth, which often exploits human and natural resources. This phenomenon calls for a countermovement that protects society and natural resources through social and public policies. Within the domain of sustainable welfare, an argument points towards the need to gain an empirical understanding of sustainable welfare policies and gather qualitative evidence that explains the conditions and mechanisms of “better” eco-social performance. This article aims to identify conditions leading to achieving sustainable welfare outcomes and discern under which conditions sustainable welfare outcomes are attainable or fail, especially in the context of the Global South. It draws on empirical data to analyse the locality-based welfare systems of 22 villages across decentralised Indonesia using a conditions-oriented approach of the crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The findings shed light on the institutional setting and policy mix leading to sustainable welfare outcomes in less-industrialised, informal economy-based, and highly decentralised country contexts. The evidence points to the presence of sustainable welfare outcomes when a substantial level of subsidiarity, self-governance, and meaningful community participation, and a policy mix covering basic needs, services for vulnerable groups, a functioning local economy, and innovative ecological practices are in place. While past research predominantly leans towards a statist-focused approach to sustainable welfare, this study proposes a society-focused perspective. It argues that transforming both modes of production and relational dynamics among society, state, and market in the Global South context is necessary, where an empowered society serves as a prerequisite for sustainable welfare outcomes.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference87 articles.

1. Cahill, M., and Fitzpatrick, T. (2002). Environmental and Welfare: Towards a Green Social Policy, Palgrave Macmillan.

2. Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our, Beacon Press.

3. Mendell, M., and Salée, D. (1991). The Legacy of Karl Polanyi, Macmillan Academic and Professional.

4. Filler, C., Mahanty, S., and Potter, L. (2020). The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Sustainability, 9.

5. Universal Basic Income, Services or Time Politics? A Critical Realist Analysis of (potentially) Transformative Responses to the Care Crisis;Dengler;J. Crit. Realism,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3