Fake News: “No Ban, No Spread—With Sequestration”

Author:

Galam Serge1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CEVIPOF—Centre for Political Research, Sciences Po—CNRS, 1, Place Saint Thomas d’Aquin, 75007 Paris, France

Abstract

To curb the spread of fake news, I propose an alternative to the current trend of implementing coercive measures. This approach would preserve freedom of speech while neutralizing the social impact of fake news. The proposal relies on creating an environment to naturally sequestrate fake news within quite small networks of people. I illustrate the process using a stylized model of opinion dynamics. In particular, I explore the effect of a simultaneous activation of prejudice tie breaking and contrarian behavior, on the spread of fake news. The results show that indeed most pieces of fake news do not propagate beyond quite small groups of people and thus pose no global threat. However, some peculiar sets of parameters are found to boost fake news so that it “naturally” invades an entire community with no resistance, even if initially shared by only a handful of agents. These findings identify the modifications of the parameters required to reverse the boosting effect into a sequestration effect by an appropriate reshaping of the social geometry of the opinion dynamics landscape. Then, all fake news items become “naturally” trapped inside limited networks of people. No prohibition is required. The next significant challenge is implementing this groundbreaking scheme within social media.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference116 articles.

1. The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news stories increases perceived accuracy of stories without warnings;Pennycook;Manag. Sci.,2018

2. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era;Lewandowsky;J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn.,2017

3. The “Need for Chaos” and motivations to share hostile political rumors;Petersen;Am. Political Sci. Rev.,2023

4. Some people just want to watch the world burn: The prevalence, psychology and politics of the “Need for Chaos”;Arceneaux;Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B,2021

5. Fake news on twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election;Grinberg;Science,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3