Affiliation:
1. Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências de Lisboa (ISEC Lisboa), Alameda das Linhas de Torres 179, 1750-142 Lisboa, Portugal
2. Centro de Investigação, Desenvolvimento e Inovação em Turismo (CiTUR)—Polo Estoril, Avenida Condes de Barcelona 808, 2769-510 Estoril, Portugal
3. Optometry and Vision Department, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28037 Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the disposal practices of optical materials in Portuguese Optical Centers. Methods: This study, conducted in the Portuguese Optical Centers across 18 districts and 308 municipalities, divided the country into 4 regions for analysis. Utilizing Google Forms®, a survey targeting Optical Center managers and related professionals was disseminated via email from February to May 2023, comprising 30 questions across 6 sections, including optical and contact lenses, maintenance solutions, eyeglass frames, and recycling participation. Data analysis employed IBM SPSS® Statistics v.27, using non-parametric tests for variable distribution. Ethical standards and privacy policies were strictly observed throughout the research process. Results: Findings indicated that there were significant differences in the final treatment of organic and mineral lenses. Organic lenses were placed in the yellow recycling bin (22.2%), while mineral lenses were placed in the green recycling bin (37.9%). In the case of contact lenses, regardless of the type (RGP, scleral lenses, conventional hydrogels, and silicone hydrogel lenses), the majority (>50%) were disposed of in general trash. Regarding eyeglass frames, there were no significant differences between mass and metal frames, mostly being discard in general waste (~30.0%). Conclusion: Approximately half of the surveyed Portuguese Optical Centers were not actively involved in recycling. This represents a missed opportunity for optometrists to play a role in enhancing recycling rates through patient education.
Reference52 articles.
1. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission;Costello;Lancet,2009
2. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: From 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health;Watts;Lancet,2018
3. The carbon footprint of Australian health care;Malik;Lancet Planet Health,2018
4. Kumar, R., Verma, A., Shome, A., Sinha, R., Sinha, S., Jha, P.K., Kumar, R., Kumar, P., and Das, S. (2021). Impacts of Plastic Pollution on Ecosystem Services, Sustainable Development Goals, and Need to Focus on Circular Economy and Policy Interventions. Sustainability, 13.
5. Ritchie, H. (2024, July 01). How Much of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Come from Plastics?. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-plastics.