The Impact of Biases on Health Disinformation Research

Author:

Peñafiel-Saiz Carmen1ORCID,Echegaray-Eizaguirre Lázaro2,Perez-de-Arriluzea-Madariaga Amaia3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Journalism Department, Campus of Leioa, University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain

2. Sociology and Market Research Area, Camarabilbao University Business School, 48011 Bilbao, Spain

3. LAMS Programme, Faculty of Arts of the Araba Campus, University of the Basque Country, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

Abstract

This work analyses the treatment of elements such as biases and their relationship with disinformation in international academic production. The first step in this process was to carry out a search for papers published in academic journals indexed in the main indexing platforms. This was followed by a bibliometric analysis involving an analysis of the production and impact of the selected publications, using social media techniques and a semantic content analysis based on abstracts. The data obtained from Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions, relating to health, biases, and fake news as well as post-truth, show how these works have multiplied in the last decade. The question relating to this research is as follows: How have cognitive biases been treated in national and international academic journals? This question is answered with respect to the scientific or research method. The results, which date from 2000 to 2024, show a considerable academic dedication to exploring the relationship between biases and health disinformation. In all these communities we have observed a relationship between production with the field of medicine as a general theme and social media. Furthermore, this connection is always tied to other subjects, such as an aversion to vaccines in Community 10; disinformation about COVID-19 on social media in Community 5; COVID-19 and conspiracy theories in Community 6; and content for the dissemination of health-related subjects on YouTube and the disinformation spread about them. The community analysis carried out shows a common factor in all the analysed communities—that of cognitive bias.

Funder

State Research Agency

System of the University of the Basque Country

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference40 articles.

1. Misinformation as a misunderstood Challenge to public health;Southwell;AJPM Am. J. Prev. Med.,2019

2. Misinformation in and about science;West;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2021

3. Hacia un estado de la cuestión de las investigaciones sobre desinformación/misinformación;Corresp. Análisis,2013

4. Discurso y manipulación: Discusión teórica y algunas aplicaciones;Rev. Signos,2006

5. Fakenews, una revisión sistemática de la literatura;Parra;Obs. (OBS) J.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3