Abstract
In Switzerland, the advantages of timber buildings for the climate are broadly discussed. In the following paper, a comparative sustainability assessment of four building alternatives is presented. Especially the contribution of implementing Swiss timber versus the implementation of imported timber is highlighted. Additionally, the timber-hybrid building structures are compared to a pure reinforced concrete structure. The timber-hybrid structure, with Swiss timber, has clear ecological advantages with only half the greenhouse gas emissions and half the non-renewable energy consumption compared to the reinforced concrete alternative. Comparing the Swiss timber alternative to the imported timber alternative, there are clear ecological advantages, as well. In terms of economic and social sustainability assessment criteria, the reinforced concrete alternative has the lowest production costs and the lowest labor intensity (measured in terms of full-time equivalents). Additionally, the paper includes an analysis of biogenic CO2 emissions and CO2 storage within the timber building alternatives. Finally, an up-scaling to the national level is attempted, showcasing the ecological and economic advantages of promoting the use of locally produced timber.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference70 articles.
1. Klimapolitik der Schweiz. Umsetzung des Übereinkommens von Paris,2018
2. Gebäude-Schweizerische Energie-Stiftunghttps://www.energiestiftung.ch/energieeffizienz-gebaeude.html
3. Biogenic carbon in buildings: a critical overview of LCA methods
4. Holzendverbrauch Schweiz 2017-Datenbericht, Berner Fachhochschule, Institut für digitale Bau- und Holzwirtschaft IDBH, im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Umwelt BAUF Abteilung Wald;Hofer,2019
5. Jahresbericht 2018/2019,2019
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献