Assistive Technology Is a Resource for Building Capabilities, but Is It Just Addressing the Symptoms of Inequality?

Author:

Steel Emily JORCID

Abstract

Advocacy for assistive technology interventions is compatible with the capabilities approach but is insufficient for addressing the disadvantage experienced by people with disability. This paper reflects on equality as an objective of the capabilities approach arising from economics, and it summarises how assistive technology and accessibility are mechanisms for achieving equality in the contemporary legal context of international disability rights. Research and advocacy for assistive technology have failed to communicate a coherent set of actions for policy makers to adopt. Defined concepts and interventions are required to prioritise and coordinate action to support individuals with assistive technology in parallel with improving collective resources by improving accessibility. Radical change in economic paradigms and societal structures that drive poverty and disability may be required for the effective adoption of assistive technology and closure of capability gaps.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference47 articles.

1. Henderson, R.F. (1975). Poverty in Australia: First Main Report/Australian Government Commission of Inquiry into Poverty, AGPS.

2. National People with Disabilities and Carers Council (2009). Shut Out: The Experience of People with Disabilities and Their Families in Australia—National Disability Strategy Consultation Report, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.

3. Clear, M. (2000). Promises, Promises: Disability and Terms of Inclusion, Federation Press.

4. Kahane, T., and Ross-Larsson, B. (2011). The World Report on Disability, World Health Organization.

5. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2018). Disability and Development Report: Realizing the Sustainable Development Goals by, for and with Persons with Disabilities, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3