Diagnostic Value of the Sentinel Lymph Node Technique in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Background: The optimal limits of the bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) template in bladder cancer treatment remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether radio-guided sentinel node (SLN) detection is a reliable technique for the perioperative localisation of potential lymphatic metastasis during cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Materials and Methods: We studied 54 patients with pT2-pT4 MIBC who underwent cystectomy with extended PLND (ePLND) augmented by the SLN technique. The identification of SLN was performed by preoperative SPECT/CT hybrid lymphoscintigraphy using peritumoral injection of nanocolloid-Tc-99m, followed by intraoperative navigation with a handheld γ-probe. All nodal specimens were collected separately and then fixed in formalin, stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and examined by an experienced uropathologist. Results: A total of 1414 LNs were resected and examined for the presence of metastases. The mean number of harvested LNs was 26 (range: 11–50) per patient. In 51 of 54 patients, 192 SLNs were resected. In addition, 20/192 (10.4%) SLNs were located outside of the ePLND area. Overall, 72 metastatic LNs (LN+) were found in 22 of 54 patients (40.7%) and in 24/192 SLNs (12.5%). The SLN technique detected LN+ in 14 of 22 (64%) patients. The SLNs were the only sites of metastasis (SLN+ = LN+) in 6 of 22 (27.3%) LN+ patients, including two cases with foci located in the pararectal region. The diagnostic values for the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and false-negative rate for the SLN technique were 66.66%, 4.16%, 28.57%, and 33.33%, respectively. Extended lymphadenectomy and its combination with the SLN technique enabled the correct assessment in 96.3 and 100% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of ePLND and SLN provides a better pN assessment compared to ePLND alone. Although the SLN technique has restrictions that limit its diagnostic value, its use as an addition to lymphadenectomy allows for the visualisation of nonstandard lymph drainage pathways that may be potential metastatic routes.