Investigating the Effectiveness of a Family Intervention after Acquired Brain or Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Soendergaard Pernille Langer123ORCID,Arango-Lasprilla Juan Carlos4ORCID,Wolffbrandt Mia Moth12,Dornonville de la Cour Frederik Lehman156ORCID,Biering-Sørensen Fin78,Norup Anne12

Affiliation:

1. Neurorehabilitation Research and Knowledge Centre, Rigshospitalet, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark

2. Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark

3. Neurorehabilitation-CPH, City of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark

4. Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA

5. Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark

6. The Elsass Foundation, 2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark

8. Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark

Abstract

(1) Background: Acquired brain injury (ABI) or spinal cord injury (SCI) constitutes a severe life change for the entire family, often resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL) and increased caregiver burden. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of a family intervention in individuals with ABI or SCI and in their family members. (2) Methods: An RCT of a family intervention group (FIG) vs. a psychoeducational group (PEG) (ratio 1:1) was performed. The FIG received an eight-week manual-based family intervention, and the PEG received one psychoeducational session. Self-reported questionnaires on QoL with the Mental Component Summary (MCS) and on caregiver burden with the Caregiver Burden Scale (CBS) were the primary outcomes. The data analysis involved linear mixed-effects regression models. (3) Results: In total, 74 participants were allocated randomly to the FIG and 84 were allocated randomly to the PEG. The FIG had significantly larger improvements on the MCS and significantly larger reductions on the CBS at the two-month follow-up than participants in the PEG (mean differences of 5.64 points on the MCS and −0.26 points on the CBS). At the eight-month follow-up, the between-group difference remained significant (mean difference of 4.59 points) on the MCS, whereas that on the CBS was borderline significant (mean change of −0.14 points). (4) Conclusions: Family intervention was superior to psychoeducation, with larger improvements in QoL and larger reductions in caregiver burden.

Funder

Council of Danish Victims Fund

Oestifterne

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3