Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption

Author:

Latif BadarORCID,Mahmood ZeeshanORCID,Tze San OngORCID,Mohd Said Ridzwana,Bakhsh Allah

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of institutional pressures on the adoption of environmental management accounting (EMA). EMA has been recognized as a valuable mechanism to deal with environmental issues. This paper uses institutional theory to explain the drivers of EMA adoption in Pakistan. Data were collected from the manufacturing sector in Pakistan through a questionnaire-based survey. The study concludes that coercive, normative and mimetic pressures have a significant and positive impact on the adoption of EMA.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference51 articles.

1. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility

2. Environmental Management Accounting and environmental accountability within universities: Current practice and future potential;Chang,2008

3. Environmental Management Accounting: The Missing Link to Sustainability;Gibassier,2018

4. The moderating role of environmental management accounting between environmental innovation and firm financial performance

5. Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3