Evaluation of Performance of Three Satellite-Derived Precipitation Products in Capturing Extreme Precipitation Events over Beijing, China

Abstract

Extreme precipitation events have a more serious impact on densely populated cities and therefore reliable estimation of extreme precipitation is very important. Satellite-derived precipitation products provide precipitation datasets with high spatiotemporal resolution. For improved applicability to estimating urban extreme precipitation, the performance of such products must be evaluated regionally. This study evaluated three satellite-derived precipitation products, the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG_V06), Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP V2), and China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD), in capturing extreme precipitation using observations acquired at 36 rainfall stations during 2001–2016 in Beijing, China. Results showed that MSWEP had the highest accuracy regarding daily precipitation data, with the highest correlation coefficient and the lowest absolute deviation between MSWEP and the rainfall station observations. CMFD demonstrated the best ability for correct detection of daily precipitation events, while MSWEP maintained the lowest rate of detecting non-rainy days as rainy days. MSWEP performed better in estimating precipitation amount and the number of precipitation days when daily precipitation was <50 mm; CMFD performed better when daily precipitation was >50 mm. All three products underestimated extreme precipitation. The Structural Similarity Index, which is a map comparison technique, was used to compare the similarities between the three products and rainfall station observations of two extreme rainstorms: “7.21” in 2012 and “7.20” in 2016. MSWEP and CMFD showed higher levels of similarity in terms of spatial–temporal structure. Overall, despite systematic underestimation, MSWEP performed better than IMERG and CMFD in estimating extreme precipitation in Beijing.