Beyond Protected Areas: Assessing Management Effectiveness of a Ramsar Site in Nepal
-
Published:2023-04-25
Issue:5
Volume:15
Page:593
-
ISSN:1424-2818
-
Container-title:Diversity
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Diversity
Author:
Thapa Kamal1ORCID,
Lindner André2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01069 Dresden, Germany
Abstract
Ramsar Sites, wetlands of international importance, are an international category of protected wetland areas recognized under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Protected areas around the world are not achieving the conservation objectives for which they were established, often due to a lack in effective management practices. Hence, protected area management effectiveness and its assessments are crucial elements of achieving responsive and pro-active management. Ramsar Sites that are not recognized as a protected area under the national park and wildlife conservation act in Nepal are often ignored for such assessments and receive little attention in terms of conservation and management. This study aimed to fill this gap by assessing Jagadishpur Reservoir Ramsar Site, which falls into the above category. The Ramsar Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool was used to assess the management effectiveness. Transformed into the global standard reporting format, the overall management effectiveness was 0.27 on a 0 to 1 scale. This score is considered to be in an inadequate range, requiring significant conservation intervention from government with support from conservation partners. This first assessment of Ramsar Site outside of protected area in Nepal and its comparison to global and European regional-level assessments provides the benchmark for future evaluation to track progress in management effectiveness. In conclusion, Ramsar Sites outside formally protected areas are often neglected and intermittent projects, and ad hoc implementation of small-scale activities seems inadequate to improve management effectiveness.
Funder
joint publication funds of the TU Dresden
Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and the SLUB Dresden
Open Access Publication Funding of the DFG
Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) of Germany
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology
Reference49 articles.
1. CBD (2021, December 15). Protected Areas—An Overview. Available online: https://www.cbd.int/protected/overview/.
2. Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Leverington, F., Dudley, N., and Courrau, J. (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas, IUCN.
3. The performance and potential of protected areas;Watson;Nature,2014
4. Social impacts of european protected areas and policy recommendations;Jones;Environ. Sci. Policy,2020
5. COP-CBD (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, UNEP-CBD.