Two Pregnancy Care Models in Poland—A Descriptive–Comparative Study

Author:

Gallas Marta1ORCID,Gaworska-Krzemińska Aleksandra1ORCID,Pogorzelczyk Katarzyna2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Nursing Management, Medical University of Gdansk, M. Sklodowskiej-Curie Street 3a, 80-227 Gdansk, Poland

2. Independent Researcher, Skødstrup, 8541 Aarhus, Denmark

Abstract

Care for a pregnant woman can take various organizational forms. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends leaders increase research into health systems. The aim of this is to manage the healthcare system in such a way as to provide beneficiaries with access to high-quality services with limited financial resources. The study presented in this paper was conducted using a diagnostic survey on a group of 1642 Polish women in the traditional model of care (TM) and 3216 women in the Coordinated Care for Pregnant Women Program (CCP). Two research tools were used in this study. The first is a survey prepared by the National Health Fund, the second is an author’s survey. The results indicate that most women (85%) receiving care under the CCP received effective pain management, compared to 67% under the traditional care model (p < 0.001). In the CCP, women were significantly more likely to receive midwife assistance in infant care (90%) than women in the traditional care model (60%) (p < 0.001). Significantly more CCP patients want to return to the same hospital for their subsequent childbirth (74%) than women in the traditional model of care (43%) (p < 0.001). In patients’ opinion, the new CCP model is superior in meeting their needs and providing higher-quality services. However, educating women that an obstetrician-gynecologist and a midwife can manage their pregnancy is still necessary. In addition to the CCP program, special attention should be paid to available pain management during childbirth since the use of analgesia is still insufficient in Polish hospitals.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. (2022, April 18). Service of the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Available online: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx.

2. (2022, April 18). Service of the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_55_2.pdf.

3. Every Newborn progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival;Lawn;Lancet,2014

4. World Health Organization (2014). Every Newborn: An Action Plan to End Preventable Deaths, WHO. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/127938.

5. Survival analysis of the association between antenatal care attendance and neonatal mortality in 57 low- and middle-income countries;Doku;Int. J. Epidemiol.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3