The Importance of Psychometric and Physical Scales for the Evaluation of the Consequences of Scars—A Literature Review

Author:

Mekeres Gabriel Mihai1ORCID,Buhaș Camelia Liana23,Csep Andrei Nicolae4,Beiușanu Corina2,Andreescu Gineta2,Marian Paula4,Cheregi Cornel Dragoș5,Fodor Radu1,Manole Felicia5

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 410087 Oradea, Romania

2. Morphological Disciplines Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania

3. Department of Legal Medicine, County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Oradea, 410169 Oradea, Romania

4. Medical Disciplines Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania

5. Surgical Disciplines Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania

Abstract

Background: Scars affect patients after trauma, burns, or surgical procedures and can generate both physical and psychosocial changes. The aesthetic damage represents the modification of a person’s physical appearance, in its bodily integrity, causing numerous sufferings and determining social or economic consequences. The aim of this research is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages offered by the available psychosocial and physical scar scales in assessing the physical, aesthetic, psychosocial, and juridical consequences of scars. This will aid to inform medical examiners about the most valued existing scales to allow them to select the most appropriate instrument to manage their patient. Methods: A broad search of relevant scientific studies on the psychosocial determinants of post-traumatic and surgical scars was conducted by using the following international database tools: PsycINFO, MedLine Social Science Index, Scopus, Web of Science, published from 1960 until 2022. Results: We analyzed 63 scientific studies to assess the advantages and limits of several psychometric and physical scar evaluation scales. Conclusions: The researchers analyzed in this review highlight the advantages and limitation of existing instruments, evidencing the demand for future scar evaluation instruments and a scar-assessing algorithm that takes into account the physical, aesthetic, psychosocial, and legal consequences of scars.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference81 articles.

1. Current and upcoming therapies to modulate skin scarring and fibrosis;Coentro;Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.,2019

2. CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells role in tumor microenvironment of the squamous cell carcinoma;Cheregi;Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol.,2021

3. Hypertrophic response and keloid diathesis: Two very different forms of scar;Burd;Plast. Reconstr. Surg.,2005

4. Structural and biophysical characteristics of human skin in maintaining proper epidermal barrier function;Boer;Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. Postȩpy Dermatol. I Alergol.,2016

5. A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring;Sidgwick;Arch. Dermatol. Res.,2015

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3